Read what customers and agents actually said.
Explore transcripts, conversation summaries, channels, brands, reasons, queues, teams, and time windows.
Salted Conversation Intelligence
Salted lets CX, support, quality, and operations teams ask natural-language questions across conversations, customer feedback, quality findings, and operational signals. The answer should not be another chart to interpret. It should point to evidence and the next useful action.
The problem
Customer operations leaders need to ask new questions every week: why one contact reason changed, what customers complain about after a policy update, which quality misses repeat, where automation escalates, and what teams should fix first.
Conversation Intelligence should reduce the distance between a business question and the evidence behind the answer. It is not a replacement for every dashboard. It is the layer that helps teams investigate, explain, and decide.
Conversation analytics + voice of customer
Salted can analyze different source types, each with clear meaning. A customer quote is not the same thing as an AI reviewer observation, and a transcript is not the same thing as a summary.
Explore transcripts, conversation summaries, channels, brands, reasons, queues, teams, and time windows.
Use survey comments and ratings when the question is about what customers said directly.
Explore contact reasons, channels, brands, teams, outcomes, customer sentiment, and repeated themes alongside the conversations that produced them.
Analyze low-scoring themes, repeated quality misses, knowledge issues, coaching patterns, and automation behavior.
Workflow
The first question should lead somewhere useful. Teams can narrow the source, inspect the evidence, compare segments, save a useful selection, and repeat the analysis as the operation changes.
This is where Conversation Intelligence connects back to the rest of Salted: a finding can become a coaching topic, a knowledge update, an automation adjustment, or a product/customer operations discussion.
Start with a business question in natural language.
Choose date, brand, channel, reason, team, customer group, or saved selection.
Inspect the source material behind the answer.
Turn the finding into coaching, knowledge, workflow, or automation change.
Connected to the platform
The answers are more useful when they can read the same conversations, feedback, quality findings, knowledge, and automation outcomes that the operation already uses.
Ask why certain teams, channels, policies, or contact reasons produce more review findings.
Analyze queues, escalation points, agent actions, customer context, and follow-up work.
Review completion patterns, guidance requests, customer feedback, and where automation should ask for help.
Surface policies that confuse customers, answers that drift, and knowledge updates that should be made explicit.
Buyer questions
It is an analysis layer over operational data. Dashboards are still useful for fixed metrics; Conversation Intelligence helps teams investigate new questions as they appear.
It can work across conversations, summaries, customer feedback, quality findings, and operational attributes such as date range, channel, brand, team, reason, queue, and customer group.
Only when the source is customer verbatim, such as transcript turns or survey comments. AI-written summaries and review observations should be treated as analyst notes, not customer quotes.
Quality reporting shows what the review system found. Conversation Intelligence lets teams ask follow-up questions across reviews, customer comments, conversations, and operating context.
Yes. It is useful for contact drivers, customer sentiment, policy friction, quality themes, automation performance, and recurring operational issues.
No. It helps analysts and leaders get to evidence faster. Important findings should still be reviewed, scoped, and turned into a concrete operational change.
Ask better questions across conversations, customer feedback, quality findings, and the operational context behind them.
Book a live demo